Internet pornography or free speech? - WALB.com, Albany News, Weather, Sports

Internet pornography or free speech?

  • More WALB News10 HeadlinesMore News HeadlinesMore>>

  • Wreck kills one on Ledo Road

    Wreck kills one on Ledo Road

    Thursday, April 17 2014 4:18 PM EDT2014-04-17 20:18:28 GMT
    A collision on Ledo Road, near hasMore >>
    A collision on Ledo Road has killed one person, near Chili's and Walmart.
    More >>
  • Today's the day for News on the Road!

    Today's the day for News on the Road!

    Thursday, April 17 2014 2:15 PM EDT2014-04-17 18:15:52 GMT
    WALB News 10 is hitting the road for our 60th anniversary. You might remember this photo from 2004. Yolanda, Dawn, and Ben having fun with the Ladies of the Red Hat Society in Tifton for WALB's 50thMore >>
    WALB News 10 is hitting the road for our 60th anniversary. You might remember this photo from 2004. Yolanda, Dawn, and Ben having fun with the Ladies of the Red Hat Society in Tifton.More >>
  • Kutcher's peanut ponder picture makes London news

    Kutcher's peanut ponder picture makes London news

    Thursday, April 17 2014 2:03 PM EDT2014-04-17 18:03:13 GMT
    Ashton Kutcher, one of the world's top TV stars, stopped to ponder Georgia's official Peanut Statue in Ashburn. His selfie, showing himself and his fiancé, Mila Kunis, appreciating the structure, hasMore >>
    Ashton Kutcher, one of the world's top TV stars, stopped to ponder Georgia's official Peanut Statue in Ashburn. His selfie, showing himself and his fiancé, Mila Kunis, appreciating the structure, has circled the globe.More >>

June 29, 2004

< p> < strong> Albany - Will your kids be protected from internet pornographers? Supreme Court Justices believe that could violate free speech.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a 1998 law aimed at shielding web-surfing kids from online porn is likely unconstitutional.

In a five-to-four decision, the nation's high court found the law probably violates the first amendment and that a lower court was right to block it from taking effect.

Albany Attorney Bob Beauchamp says the justices sent the case back to a lower court for a trial. That gives the government a chance to prove its stance that the law does not go too far. He says, "But, because of the way the statute was drafted, it was a very close call. It needed to be sent down to the lower courts to decide what's more important, protecting these children or protecting our free speech? If it's not very defined in that statute then the court is not going to uphold it."

The Child Online Protection Act (COPA) passed in 1998, but never took effect.

Those posting material deemed harmful to children within easy reach on the internet could have faced a $50,000 fine and six months in prison.

posted at 6:20PM by kathryn.simmons@walb.com

 

Powered by WorldNow